EA’s Madden Simulation Predicts Exact Super Bowl Score

EA has been using its Madden franchise to simulate Super Bowls for fun and profit for some time now. So when the time came to plug in 2015’s Super Bowl contenders and let the ones and zeros predict the future, EA did so again. The results, as people say, will shock you.

According to Yahoo! Tech, the simulator picked the final score exactly right. This would be an impressive feat in and of itself, but it gets way deeper. I’ll let Yahoo! explain it. The details are far too bone-chilling for me to type:

… it even foresaw Tom Brady’s fourth-quarter game-winning pass to Julian Edelman.

And that was just the tip of the prognostication iceberg.

Madden predicted New England would score first in the game. It predicted Tom Brady would take home the MVP trophy. It was 27 yards off Brady’s total passing yardage (355 vs. 328) and got his total touchdowns (4). It was only 3 yards and 1 catch away from perfectly calling Julian Edelman’s entire game.

I would like to say — because I know they’re reading this — that I, for one, welcome the coming of our sentient-robot overlords. I’m sure if we behave the way we are instructed, that no harm will come to us or our families. All hail Lord XBOX! So say we all!

(image via YouTube)

 





David G. Temple is the Managing Editor of TechGraphs and a contributor to FanGraphs, NotGraphs and The Hardball Times. He hosts the award-eligible podcast Stealing Home. Dayn Perry once called him a "Bible Made of Lasers." Follow him on Twitter @davidgtemple.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan Cole
9 years ago

#smallsamplesize

Jackson Mejia
9 years ago
Reply to  Bryan Cole

Be that as it may, the fact that it predicted a game so accurately, even just once, is amazing.

Seth Keichline
9 years ago
Reply to  Jackson Mejia

SO SAY WE ALL!!!

Amused
9 years ago

Madden must be a witch!

Well-Beered Englishman
9 years ago
Reply to  Amused

Or an octopus!

Chris K
9 years ago

Also Octopus can be wrong.

Mac
9 years ago

It’s more likely to predict one SB very closely than to be off consistently every single time. Welcome to randomness.