REVIEW: Schmoylent, Bags of Powder from the Internet
FUN FACT ALERT: The day I started putting this review into actual writing, I got this letter from the makers of Schmoylent — the very product I had been consuming for the purpose of reviewing.
Here’s the skinny: This is not for everyone. In fact, I’m specifically asking, “Is this right for athletes?” I spent a good many years as a collegiate athlete who struggled with nutrition and calories. For college students tight on money and limited on time, though, this could be a good fit. I was a scholarship athlete who could never get calories under control because I was too exhausted and too poor to eat anywhere but the cafeteria, and too poor to afford healthy, but quick groceries.
Liquid meals, therefore, could offer the necessary solution for the under- and overfed athlete on the budget. And that is the purpose of this investigation. It is to find the possibility of the Soylent Athlete.

Grades
Taste: 8
Texture: 7
Nutrients: 10
Packaging: 3
Ego Depletion: 6
Price: 6 ($4.04 per meal)
Rating: 6.7
Taste
I gave name brand Soylent a 5-out-of-10 rating in taste and basically said no thanks. I’m giving Schmoylent an 8-out-of-10 rating and saying I hardly knew thee. The difference in taste? So far as I can tell, the only difference is the inclusion of chocolate powder in Schmoylent. Could that have made the powder-drink that much more likeable? Or maybe it was the fact that Schmoylent is based off an earlier version of Soylent, one which required the user to add a few bits of oil during the mixing process?
Not that I could taste the coconut oil I was adding per se, but I do recall wondering often how my Soylent would taste with some sort of smoothing agent like oil added to it. Was it better tasting than my so-far favorite 100% Food? Boy, it’s hard for me to believe it, but for some reason I just really like the taste of Schmoylent. I looked forward to my Schmoylent meals.
Texture
Much like Soylent, it tastes dusty. Maybe my having tried Soylent first prepared me in ways that 100% Food failed to prepare me for Soylent. But all I know for certain is that the texture, while not enjoyable, was not a deal-breaker this time.
Nutrients
A nice 2100 calorie supply of food with:
Carbohydrate: 252g
Protein: 114g
Fat: 70g
Fiber: 27g
That’s essentially the aim of this whole project — get sufficient nutrients and do so in a sustainable way. The latter half is still pending, but the nutrients of these liquid meals have typically left me feeling as or more awake and ready than ever.
Packaging
Here’s the problem with Schmoylent: It arrived in unmarked zipper bags.

Soylent and 100% Food are both clearly young companies, but at least they had unique, professional-looking packaging. Schmoylent felt like some sort of terrifying Internet dare. And while I ultimately loved the product, the packaging would be such a tough sell that I imagine many users would never even taste the product upon seeing it’s floppy, suspicious transmission device.
And besides being a PR problem, the bags also constitute a practicality problem. Whereas 100% Food had self-contained bottles and Soylent had a free pitcher with the first order, Schmoylent lacked any storage accommodations. I was lucky my Soylent order arrived before Schmoylent, otherwise I wouldn’t have had a pitcher appropriate to render my Schmoylent portable (and thereby practical).

Ego Depletion
I honestly think I could eat Schmoylent long term. Had it not ceased its deliveries already. Oh well.
Price
While $4.04 is still better than Taco Bell, but not as good as Soylent’s grocery-level $3.06 price point — especially considering that Soylent also sends a pitcher with the first order.
Conclusions
My final say on Schmoylent:
- So far, Schmoylent tasted the best. Still dusty though, so maybe my tastes have begun to change.
- That means I should probably give Soylent another go.
- I shall miss you Schmoylent, you and your terrifying mystery bags of health powder.
Until the next one, eat well, my friends!
Other Reviews
- 100% Food: 7.7
- Schmoylent: 6.7
- Soylent: 6.3
Check out the Soylent subreddit for some great resources on liquid meal-replacements.
Isn’t there also “Schmilk”? I think Sam Sifton of the NY Times recently tried a number of these and Schmilk was in there.
Yeah, I believe the Schmilk people make Schmoylent.
I found the texture of the 100% food product to be completely unconsumable for me. Do they make a batch without the whole seed grains throughout? Or would Solent be a better type to try if it’s smoother?
All the 100% Food varieties I tried had the seeds. I rather liked that, but it was a deal-breaker for my wife. Soylent and Schmoylent were both seed-free and had much smoother texture.
If you can handle the dusty, almost gritty texture (which I’m growing to tolerate), then those two might be legit options for you.
I believe JouleFuel is made by active CrossFitters, and the product is geared towards people with more of an active lifestyle. They sell a larger volume, with whole food ingredients and higher protein content. There was a post about it on the soylent subreddit maybe a month ago, they don’t appear to be active on reddit though. Might be worth checking out for this study.